<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: On the Need for a Good Computer Science History Course</title>
	<atom:link href="http://versionthis.com/~npilon/2008/02/28/on-the-need-for-a-good-computer-science-history-course/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://versionthis.com/~npilon/2008/02/28/on-the-need-for-a-good-computer-science-history-course/</link>
	<description>An approximation of super-polynomial thinking</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 00:31:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Nick Pilon</title>
		<link>http://versionthis.com/~npilon/2008/02/28/on-the-need-for-a-good-computer-science-history-course/comment-page-1/#comment-7</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick Pilon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 15:21:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://versionthis.com/~npilon/2008/02/28/on-the-need-for-a-good-computer-science-history-course/#comment-7</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not so sure about that. I think it may depend on how the university in question&#039;s organized. The university I graduated from has changed its syllabus several times since I started there. And not only has the selection of required courses changed, but the number of required courses has changed too. I&#039;m also not particularly enamoured with the structure of the first couple years of most CS programs, so I&#039;ve got no problems with advocating wide-ranging changes to them.

I&#039;d be interested in knowing just how fixed the syllabus is at many universities. If it is, as you say, determined entirely by grants rather than educational concerns, that&#039;s a very sad state of affairs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not so sure about that. I think it may depend on how the university in question&#8217;s organized. The university I graduated from has changed its syllabus several times since I started there. And not only has the selection of required courses changed, but the number of required courses has changed too. I&#8217;m also not particularly enamoured with the structure of the first couple years of most CS programs, so I&#8217;ve got no problems with advocating wide-ranging changes to them.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d be interested in knowing just how fixed the syllabus is at many universities. If it is, as you say, determined entirely by grants rather than educational concerns, that&#8217;s a very sad state of affairs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maros</title>
		<link>http://versionthis.com/~npilon/2008/02/28/on-the-need-for-a-good-computer-science-history-course/comment-page-1/#comment-6</link>
		<dc:creator>Maros</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 12:27:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://versionthis.com/~npilon/2008/02/28/on-the-need-for-a-good-computer-science-history-course/#comment-6</guid>
		<description>Just a note:
Since the required courses are paid from grants, there is typically no chance to include a new one to the syllabus. Not required course must be enough.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just a note:<br />
Since the required courses are paid from grants, there is typically no chance to include a new one to the syllabus. Not required course must be enough.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

